December 10, 2022

The former evangelical says he was aware of the 2014 Supreme Court ruling before it was released


A former evangelical said in a letter to the Chief Justice of the United States that he was aware of the outcome. 2014 The Supreme Court decision involving contraception and the Affordable Care Act, before the formal announcement, said the The New York Times.

Rev. Rob Schenck wrote in a letter this summer to Chief Justice John Roberts, first obtained by The Times, that he was briefed by Gayle Wright, a wealthy political donor, before the ruling came out.

As stated therein Letter dated June This year but not sent until next month, Wright had dinner with Justice Samuel Alito and his wife and talked about the upcoming ruling at the time.

“During their table conversation, she suggested that she might be able to find out the status of the case, which she knew I wanted to know. I received a follow-up message from her during that visit informing me that she had indeed received the information. We spoke on the phone and she elaborated on the disclosure,” Schenck wrote. , according to the Times.

A source close to Schenk confirmed the letter to CNN.

“Mr. Schenck confirms the detailed details and facts he provided regarding these events,” the source told CNN.

The 2014 judgment involved the case Burwell v. Entertainment lobby. The 5-4 court ruled that family-owned companies like Hobby Lobby are not required to pay insurance premiums for certain types of contraception under the Affordable Care Act, without violating a federal law aimed at protecting religious freedom. Alito wrote the opinion.

Alito, in a statement the Supreme Court provided to CNN on Saturday, called the allegations about the dinner conversation “absolutely false.”

“My wife and I became acquainted with the Wrights a few years ago because of their strong support of the Supreme Court Historical Society, and since then we have had a casual and purely social relationship. “I have never detected any attempt by the Wrights to obtain classified information or influence anything I did, whether official or private, and I would have strongly objected if they had,” Alito said.

Wright vehemently denied Schenck’s claims in an interview with CNN on Saturday.

“This whole thing is incredibly misunderstood,” he said, noting that Alito had never discussed a particular case and that he had never heard of one.

“The cases are never discussed, everyone knows that,” he said.

Wright confirmed to CNN that she and her husband remember having dinner with Alitos at their home, getting sick during dinner, and Alito offering to drive her home. That was the only time she dined at the Justice’s house, but she said she saw him occasionally over the years. He called any allegation that they discussed the outcome of a case “absolutely not”.

A source told CNN on Saturday that Schenk had not heard from the court about his letter.

Schenk said in the letter I am sharing the information now to help Roe v. An investigation into the leaked draft that overruled Wade is ongoing. The Times reported, “Mr. There are gaps in Schenck’s account of the breach” but a series of emails and conversations indicate he knew the outcome of the case before the public verdict.

“Given that whoever was responsible for the initial leak or the latest draft comment could face severe penalties, I thought this earlier incident might merit some consideration,” he wrote.

The draft opinion in this year’s Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health System case was authored by Alito and appeared to have a five-justice majority to overturn the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision. Politico obtained and reported on the draft opinion in early May, and the leak, which rocked the court, sparked protests across the country. Official Dobbs Verdict Overturning Roe Released at the end of June.

An unprecedented investigation into a breach of confidentiality by the country’s highest court has prompted sudden demands for private cell data from law clerks, but there is a lack of transparency about where things stand now and the earlier leak could harm the court. why Public confidence is already at an all-time low.

Brian Fallon, executive director of the liberal group Demand Justice, called on the Senate Judiciary Committee on Saturday to “investigate the apparent leak.”

“The whistleblower in this report, the Rev. Rob Schenck, should be called to testify about the leak and the years of lobbying that led to him grooming Alito and other Republican justices,” Fallon said in a statement.