July 4, 2022

Sources in the January 6 House Inquiry say Ginny Thomas wrote a letter to John Eastman

Placeholder when article actions are loaded

On January 6, 2021, the House Committee to Investigate the Capitol received an e-mail correspondence between Virginia “Ginny” Thomas, wife of Supreme Court Judge Clarence Thomas, and attorney John Eastman, who played a key role in the attempts to pressurize Wise. President Mike Pence to block Joe Biden’s certificate of success, according to three people involved in the committee’s investigation.

The emails show that Thomas’ attempts to overthrow the election are far more comprehensive than previously known, the two said. The trio declined to give details and spoke anonymously to discuss important matters.

The three said committee members and staff are now debating whether to spend time during the public hearing examining Ginny Thomas’ role in trying to change the outcome of the 2020 election. Washington Post Previously reported The panel did not request an interview with Thomas and leaned against continuing his cooperation in its investigation.

Both reported the presence of emails in documents received by the team and recently reviewed. Last week, a federal judge ordered Eastman to hand over more than 100 documents to the panel. Eastman sought to prevent the release of those documents and other documents, arguing that they were privileged communications and therefore should be protected.

The Post has previously reported that Thomas sent messages to President Donald Trump’s White House chief Mark Meadows and Arizona lawmakers, urging them to help thwart the election.

Although Thomas claims that Thomas and her husband operate on separate professional paths, his activities as a conservative political activist have long distinguished him from other associates of Supreme Court justices. Any new revelations about Thomas’ actions after the 2020 presidential election will further intensify questions about whether Clarence Thomas should withdraw himself from election-related cases and attempts to dismantle it.

In January, the Supreme Court rejected Trump’s request to block the release of his White House record to the House Committee of Inquiry on January 6. Leaning to Trump’s side, Clarence Thomas was the only judge to disagree.

Ginny Thomas did not immediately respond to requests for comment, nor did Eastman or his attorney. A Supreme Court spokeswoman did not respond to a request for comment from Clarence Thomas.

A spokesman for the Jan. 6 committee declined to comment.

Eastman, who once worked as a clerk for Clarence Thomas in the Supreme Court, outlined legal references and footage of Biden’s rejection of the presidency at the Oval Office meeting with Trump and Pence on January 4, The Post and other outlets previously reported. Eastman then said that Trump was his client.

Earlier this year, U.S. District Attorney David O. Carter rejected Eastman’s claim of privilege and ordered Eastman to release a number of documents to the committee. In April and May, Eastman handed over more than 1,000 documents to the committee.

In a 26-page judgment last week, Carter cited another 599 documents that Eastman sought to defend. Carter ruled that more than 400 of those documents were protected by attorney-client or other privileges and should not be published.

But he ordered the committee to hand over documents related to correspondence and election fraud with state legislators and plans to disrupt the joint sitting of Congress on January 6 last week and earlier this week.

Carter described some documents in more detail than others.

He ordered Eastman to hand over documents related to the group’s three December 2020 meetings, which Eastman described as “citizens with a conservative perspective”, and invited Eastman to speak, including messages from a person described as the group’s “top leader”. A meeting on December 8, 2020. The meeting agenda notes that Eastman discussed “state legislative measures that could change the media, known as the election for Joe Biden.”

“The selection committee is of considerable interest in these three meetings because the presentations have enhanced the main purpose of the January 6 program: competing states must certify alternative voters for President Trump,” Carter said. Wrote.

It is not clear what the group is or who its top leader is.

Carter ordered the release of an excerpt from a December 22 email he wrote to an unidentified lawyer. By clarifying that Pence has no ability to interfere in the counting of votes, the attorney general encouraged Trump’s legal team not to pursue a case that could have prevented the January 6 strategy. “Lawyers should not pursue cases; They are not free to escape judicial review to overthrow a democratic election, “Carter wrote.

The judge also ordered the release of several communications that share news or tweets.

In the weeks following the 2020 election, Ginny pressed Thomas Meadows again to reverse the decision. Text messages Retrieved from The Post and CBS News. After Jan. 6, Biden said in a speech to Meadows that he was “disgusted” at Benz for refusing to help the Electoral College withhold a certificate of success. He wrote, “We feel like the end of the United States.”

In the same post-election period, Thomas also urged Republican lawmakers in Arizona to help keep Trump in office by setting aside Biden’s popular vote and “choosing” their own electorate. Reported, Based on documents obtained by request for public records. Thomas sent emails through FreeRoots, an online site designed to facilitate the sending of pre-written messages to multiple select officials.

Nov. In an email on the 9th, just days after media companies competed for Fiden in Arizona and nationally, Thomas sent identical emails to 27 legislators in the Arizona House and Senate urging them to “stand strong in the face of political and media pressure.” The e-mail said that “the responsibility of electing voters is” yours and yours “under Arizona state law, and that the legislature has” the power to fight fraud “and” ensure a clean slate. “

In a follow-up email to one of the recipients, State Representative Shawna Polly, Thomas described the email as “part of our campaign to help states make America’s eyes see.”

Polick (R), who provided links that Thomas could use to report frauds he experienced in Arizona, told The Post that he received tens of thousands of emails after the election and responded to Thomas in the same way he did. Everyone else.

On December 13, the day before the presidential election was voted down and Biden won, Thomas emailed 21 of the lawmakers and two others. “Before you choose the voters of your state … if you do not stand up and lead, think about what will happen to the nation we all want,” the email said. It is linked to a video of a man urging swing-state lawmakers to “do things right” and “do not succumb to cowardice.”

The next day, Democratic voters in Arizona voted for Biden. Republican voters met individually and signed a document declaring themselves the state’s “duly elected and eligible voters.” A dozen Arizona lawmakers have signed a letter to Congress asking that the state’s election vote go to Trump or be “completely abolished until a full forensic audit is conducted.”