August 15, 2022

House Oversight Committee, Daniel Snyder disagree on terms of testimony

House Oversight Committee, Daniel Snyder disagree on terms of testimony

Suspension

If Washington Kinders owner Daniel Snyder agrees to provide “full and complete” testimony, the House Committee on Oversight and Reform will accept his offer to appear remotely on July 28 as part of its investigation into the NFL team’s workplace, the president wrote to Snyder’s attorney on Monday. Tuesday .

was history One of two featured by Karen Patton Seymour last weekSnyder’s attorney, but there is still considerable disagreement over the terms of his appearance.

Seymour stated that Snyder would only appear if his “due process” concerns could be resolved. To that end, she offered to have Snyder appear “voluntarily,” meaning that he would not be placed under oath and could refuse to answer certain questions. Seymour also told the committee’s task force that Snyder would not address questions related to matters covered by the nondisclosure agreements. Several employees of former leaders who provided stories of sexual harassment or abuse were required to sign nondisclosure agreements to receive severance payments.

Representative Caroline B. Maloney (DN.Y.) said in a letter on Tuesday that these terms were unacceptable and the committee intended to proceed with a subpoena “to ensure that Mr. Snyder’s testimony will be complete and complete and will not be restricted in the manner it would have been if the filing had been voluntarily.”

Under a subpoena, Snyder will be placed under oath, cannot choose which questions to answer and cannot cite nondisclosure agreements as a reason for refusing to answer questions. Such an interrogation will be conducted by the counsel of the House of Representatives and will be conducted in a private place.

A Snyder spokesperson said late Tuesday, “Mr. Snyder’s attorneys are reviewing the committee’s letter to determine whether their due process concerns, including the circumstances of Mr. Snyder’s appearance, have been appropriately addressed.”

Witnesses told the commission that Daniel Snyder was not “raising his hand” as an NFL owner.

In a letter on Tuesday, Maloney wrote: “I have made it clear to Commission staff that voluntary appearances will exclude matters covered by NDAs. Mr. Snyder has a troubling history of using NDAs to cover up workplace misconduct—a core behavior in our investigation. — and it would be completely inappropriate for him to use the same tactic to withhold information from the commission. Other former commanders have participated in the commission’s subpoenas, and Mr. Snyder should not be treated any differently.”

Snyder declined the committee’s invitation to testify at the June 22 public hearing on Capitol Hill about the team’s workplace, citing scheduling conflicts and concerns about due process and “due process.”

NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell accepted the committee’s invitation and testified remotely that day. In response to Snyder’s disdain, Maloney said that she A subpoena will be issued to compel Snyder to testify By depositing the following week. So far, Snyder and his attorney have refused to receive the subpoena. Seymour said Snyder is still out of the country.

Concluding Tuesday’s three-page letter, Maloney noted that the commission had delayed Snyder’s filing by nearly one month to accommodate his schedule and would extend such additional facilities as allowing him to testify remotely, giving him access to exhibits and conducting written interviews with other witnesses. and supply it. With a description of the types of information revised in previous texts.

Maloney has set a Wednesday noon deadline for Snyder’s attorneys to confirm that she will accept the panel’s subpoena service and that Snyder will appear on the Zoom recording on July 28.