August 19, 2022

Fulton grand jury subpoenas Giuliani, Graham, Trump confidants

Trump’s personal attorney, Giuliani, testified before Georgia lawmakers on three separate occasions in late 2020. His remarks, which have become of great interest to the special grand jury, are filled with sensational claims and conspiracy theories about tens of thousands of people voting illegally. The rigged voting machines were quickly removed by state officials or thrown out in the courts. He was suspended from practicing law in New York in June 2021 because of his testimony in Georgia.

Eastman, a former law professor, was a key architect of the plan to pressure Vice President Mike Pence to reject official Democratic voters in Georgia and other swing states and choose an alternative choice of GOP voters. “It is more likely than not that President Trump and Dr. Eastman dishonestly conspired to prevent a joint session of Congress on January 6, 2021,” a federal judge argued in March.

ExploreThe latest in a Trump grand jury investigation

Eastman testified at a Georgia legislative hearing after the election, during which he argued there was “ample” evidence of fraud and improper conduct.

“I don’t think it’s your authority to do that,” Eastman said, “but I think you have an obligation to do it to protect the integrity of elections in Georgia.”

Mitchell, a conservative attorney in Washington, DC, advised Trump on the infamous January 2, 2021, call to Republican Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensberger. During that conversation, Trump asked Raffensberger to “find” 11,780 votes that Mitchell had helped Trump because he made unsubstantiated claims about Georgia’s elections.

Graham called out Raffensperger separately in the days following the November 2020 election and questioned whether the secretary of state had the authority to reject illegal votes to help Trump narrow his deficit in Georgia. Graham denied the allegations.

Giuliani’s attorney, Bob Costello, declined to comment and said his client had not been served with a subpoena. A spokesman for Graham did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Fulton attorneys may have difficulty obtaining testimony from Giuliani, Eastman, Mitchell, Chesbro and Ellis because they may argue attorney-client privilege. Eastman argued for immunity as he tried to block the handover of evidence to a select committee investigating the January 6 attack, though he was largely shot down by a federal judge.

Fulton County DA Fanny Willis A criminal investigation has been initiated Georgia’s elections in February 2021, just weeks after the Trump-Raffensberger phone call recording was leaked. He expanded the investigation to include fraudulent GOP voters, Giuliani’s testimony to state legislators and other efforts to pressure Georgia officials to act in favor of Trump.

ExploreFulton DA faces biggest decision of career in Trump grand jury report

The special grand jury is allowed to meet until May 2023, though Willis said he expects the panel’s work to wrap up before long. The jurors are expected to produce a report at the end of their service recommending whether Willis should be indicted against Trump or his associates, although the final decision rests with Willis, a Democrat.

Secretary of State Brad Raffensburger, Several of his representatives and Attorney General Chris Carr Perariwalan had previously testified. Gov. Brian Kemp rejected Trump’s pressure to call a special session of the state Legislature to reverse the election results. A video report is planned Later this month.

Willis is currently battling at least two current and former Republican officials in Georgia over subpoenas. Attorneys for Lt. Gov. Jeff Duncan and former Sen. William Lycon argued last week The state constitution protects them from testifying about anything related to their legislative proceedings.

Explore‘Breakdown – The Trump Grand Jury’ Episode 3: Is there a criminal case?

The district attorney’s office argues that activities seeking to alter certified election results are not protected by so-called legislative power.

“If dishonesty or misrepresentation is the result, members should be questioned by a special purpose grand jury,” the DA said in a recent court filing.

McBurney heard arguments from the DA’s office and lawmakers Currently creating a framework About the types of questions lawyers can ask without violating immunity rules.