While many COVID restrictions have inadvertently rolled back over the past several months, many companies and universities still enforce vaccine mandates for new employees or students.
Despite clear and strong evidence that vaccines do not prevent the spread of the virus, officials have steadfastly refused to change the course of mandates.
Whether out of a desire to avoid admitting wrongdoing or a willful disregard for reality, these insidious policies have continued to affect tens of millions of people.
now New prepress study involving a systematic review and analysis of secondary data conducted by Italian researchers who attempted to academically measure the efficacy of vaccines against Omicron.
While many acknowledged that the two-dose vaccination series no longer protects against symptomatic infection, as recently as December 2021, Dr Fauci said Claimed that the reinforcement It was 75% effective in preventing symptoms caused by Omicron.
The researcher’s findings do not bode well for the nation’s top public health “expert” and those who appeal to him to justify their undefined mandates.
In direct contrast to Fauci and other “experts”, the results of the study indicate that the vaccine is less than 20% effective against infection and less than 25% against symptomatic diseases after only a few months:
We found significant immune escape associated with omicron infection and symptomatic disease, after two and three doses. The half-life for protection from symptomatic infection provided by two doses was estimated in the range of 178-456 days for delta, and between 66 and 73 days for omicron. Enhanced doses were found to restore VE to levels similar to those gained shortly after administration of the second dose; However, a rapid decrease in the enhanced VE against Omicron was observed, with less than 20% VE against infection and less than 25% VE against disease symptoms at 9 months of booster administration.
It is important to point out that the Food and Drug Administration Authorization Threshold COVID vaccines were 50% effective in preventing the disease.
Not only are the first two series of doses unable to maintain this norm, the booster dose, which according to Fauci was supposed to “keep people healthy,” quickly fizzles out to half that against symptomatic disease.
Of note, their review of evidence excluded studies that measured antibody levels to account for efficacy, considering the FDA vaccines ear For young children based on antibody production:
“The regulators allowed vaccine makers to infer efficacy by demonstrating that vaccines can elicit levels of antibodies similar to those that were protective in adolescents and young adults, a concept known as immune sedation. This helped speed up the trials.”
Rather than the FDA fervently hoping antibody levels will lead to high rates of efficacy, this research shows just the opposite.
In this light, it is impossible to reasonably defend enhanced mandates for healthy college students or employees on the basis of “protecting the health and well-being of others.”
There is little or no protection against infection with dominant variants, eliminating any claim that delegations are necessary.
Somehow it seems doubtful that any of the supposed “experts” or their media partners would reconsider previous data in light of new research showing that their estimates were hopelessly incorrect.
“Amateur organizer. Wannabe beer evangelist. General web fan. Certified internet ninja. Avid reader.”